What could “freemium” UX for gas look like across L2s?
Gas fees are one of those things crypto natives tolerate.
New users? Not so much.
To most people, gas feels like a glitch in the product, not a cost of the protocol. And the truth is: that friction kills more onboarding than we admit.
What If Gas Didn’t Have to Be Paid… Up Front?Let’s imagine a Web3 UX where gas fees are invisible by default.
Not abstracted. Not discounted. Just… not there — unless you want them to be.
What would dApps look like if users could:
We’re not talking about a tech stack shift. We’re talking about a UX mindset shift. The Web2 Analogy: Freemium UX
In the Web2 world, payment friction is delayed, smoothed out, or entirely hidden at first.
Why doesn’t Web3 offer a similar ramp?
This Is Already Happening, But It’s FragmentedBut all of these still feel like developer-led experiments. The user rarely feels like they’re in control.
Let’s flip that.
Five Models for Optional GasHere’s how a future UX could look:
Not really. The tooling exists: Account Abstraction, ERC-4337, meta-transactions, session keys.
The real blocker is UX imagination. Too many teams still design with the assumption that users must understand gas, plan around it, and prepay it.
But we don’t do that in any other digital system.
Optional Gas Isn’t Free — It’s Just SmarterWe’re not saying gas should vanish. We’re saying the way users experience gas needs to evolve.
Let them skip. Let them defer. Let them not think about it until they care.
If crypto wants to onboard millions, we need fewer dashboards asking for $0.98 to click a button, and more flows that just say:
“Go ahead. We got you.”If Gas Fees Were Optional… was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.